Vague Naturalness as Ersatz Metaphysical Vagueness

Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 11:243–277 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I propose a view that I call "Ersatz Metaphysical Vagueness" according to which the term "perfectly natural" can be semantically vague. As its name suggests, the view mimics traditional metaphysical vagueness without the radical metaphysical underpinnings. In particular, the ersatzer avoids a widely accepted argument schema (advanced by JRG Williams, Ted Sider, Cian Dorr, John Hawthorne and others) according to which, if there is no metaphysical vagueness, F-ness cannot be both perfectly natural and vague.

Author's Profile

Rohan Sud
Virginia Tech


Added to PP

249 (#54,713)

6 months
105 (#30,832)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?