Construct Stabilization and the Unity of the Mind-Brain Sciences

Philosophy of Science 83 (5):662-673 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper offers a critique of an account of explanatory integration that claims that explanations of cognitive capacities by functional analyses and mechanistic explanations can be seamlessly integrated. It is shown that achieving such explanatory integration requires that the terms designating cognitive capacities in the two forms of explanation are stable but that experimental practice in the mind-brain sciences currently is not directed at achieving such stability. A positive proposal for changing experimental practice so as to promote such stability is put forward and its implications for explanatory integration are briefly considered.
Reprint years
2015, 2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-12-11
Latest version: 3 (2016-11-19)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
433 ( #9,903 of 50,414 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #10,231 of 50,414 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.