Universality caused: the case of renormalization group explanation

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (3):36 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, many have argued that there are certain kinds of abstract mathematical explanations that are noncausal. In particular, the irrelevancy approach suggests that abstracting away irrelevant causal details can leave us with a noncausal explanation. In this paper, I argue that the common example of Renormalization Group explanations of universality used to motivate the irrelevancy approach deserves more critical attention. I argue that the reasons given by those who hold up RG as noncausal do not stand up to critical scrutiny. As a result, the irrelevancy approach and the line between casual and noncausal explanation deserves more scrutiny.

Author's Profile

Emily Sullivan
Saginaw Valley State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-13

Downloads
454 (#35,169)

6 months
92 (#41,677)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?