Universality caused: the case of renormalization group explanation

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recently, many have argued that there are certain kinds of abstract mathematical explanations that are noncausal. In particular, the irrelevancy approach suggests that abstracting away irrelevant causal details can leave us with a noncausal explanation. In this paper, I argue that the common example of Renormalization Group explanations of universality used to motivate the irrelevancy approach deserves more critical attention. I argue that the reasons given by those who hold up RG as noncausal do not stand up to critical scrutiny. As a result, the irrelevancy approach and the line between casual and noncausal explanation deserves more scrutiny.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SULUCT
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-06-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-06-13

Total views
138 ( #29,675 of 52,929 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #19,659 of 52,929 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.