Is the mystery an illusion? Papineau on the problem of consciousness

Synthese 163 (2):133-143 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A number of philosophers have recently argued that consciousness properties are identical with some set of physical or functional properties and that we can explain away the frequently felt puzzlement about this claim as a delusion or confusion generated by our different ways of apprehending or thinking about consciousness. This paper examines David Papineau’s influential version of this view. According to Papineau, the difference between our “phenomenal” and “material” concepts of consciousness produces an instinctive but erroneous intuition that these concepts can’t co-refer. I claim that this account fails. To begin with, it is arguable that we are mystified about physicalism even when the account predicts that we shouldn’t be. Further, and worse, the account predicts that an “intuition of distinctness” will arise in cases where it clearly does not. In conclusion, I make some remarks on the prospects for, constraints on, and alternatives to, a successful defence of the claim
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Phenomenal Concepts.Sundström, Pär

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
458 ( #7,092 of 43,789 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #10,590 of 43,789 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.