Veritism Unswamped

Mind 127 (506):381-435 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to Veritism, true belief is the sole fundamental epistemic value. Epistemologists often take Veritism to entail that all other epistemic items can only have value by standing in certain instrumental relations—namely, by tending to produce a high ratio of true to false beliefs or by being products of sources with this tendency. Yet many value theorists outside epistemology deny that all derivative value is grounded in instrumental relations to fundamental value. Veritists, I believe, can and should follow suit. After setting the stage in §1, I explain in §2 why Veritism should not take an Instrumentalist form. Instrumentalist Veritism faces a generalized version of the swamping problem. But this problem undermines Instrumentalism, not Veritism: granting Instrumentalism, similar problems arise for any economical epistemic axiology. I show in §3 how Veritism can take a less narrow form and solve the swamping problem. After answering some objections in §4, I consider in §5 what some would regard as a less radical alternative solution and argue that it either fails or collapses into mine. I close in §6 by taking stock and re-evaluating the overall prospects for Veritism, suggesting that it is a highly promising epistemic axiology when divorced from Instrumentalism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Why Be Rational?Kolodny, Niko
What We Owe to Each Other.Scanlon, Thomas M.

View all 75 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
299 ( #11,064 of 42,168 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #9,295 of 42,168 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.