Arrogance, anger and debate

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Arrogance has widespread negative consequences for epistemic practices. Arrogant people tend to intimidate and humiliate other agents, and to ignore or dismiss their views. They have a propensity to mansplain. They are also angry. In this paper I explain why anger is a common manifestation of arrogance in order to understand the effects of arrogance on debate. I argue that superbia is a vice of superiority characterised by an overwhelming desire to diminish other people in order to excel and by a tendency to arrogate special entitlements for oneself, including the privilege of not having to justify one’s claims.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2018
ISBN(s)
1584-174X  
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TANAAA-7
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-06-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse.Aristotle, & Kennedy, George A.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-07-11

Total views
47 ( #32,154 of 40,135 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #14,729 of 40,135 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.