Buddhist Philosophy of Logic

In Steven Michael Emmanuel (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 320-330 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Logic in Buddhist Philosophy concerns the systematic study of anumāna (often translated as inference) as developed by Dignāga (480-540 c.e.) and Dharmakīti (600-660 c.e.). Buddhist logicians think of inference as an instrument of knowledge (pramāṇa) and, thus, logic is considered to constitute part of epistemology in the Buddhist tradition. According to the prevalent 20th and early 21st century ‘Western’ conception of logic, however, logical study is the formal study of arguments. If we understand the nature of logic to be formal, it is difficult to see what bearing logic has on knowledge. In this paper, by weaving together the main threads of thought that are salient in Dignāga’s and Dharmakīti’s texts, I shall re-conceive the nature of logic in the context of epistemology and demarcate the logical part of epistemology which can be recognised as logic. I shall demonstrate that we can recognise the logical significance of inference as understood by Buddhist logicians despite the fact that its logical significance lies within the context of knowledge.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TANBPO-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Paraconsistent Logic.Priest, Graham

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Buddhist Idealism.Finnigan, Bronwyn

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-09-12

Total views
941 ( #2,839 of 46,264 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
360 ( #974 of 46,264 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.