Immortal Curiosity

Philosophical Forum 44 (3):255-273 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper discusses Bernard Williams’ argument that immortality is rationally undesirable because it leads to insufferable boredom. We first spell out Williams’ argument in the form of a dilemma. We then show that the first horn of this dilemma, namely Williams’ requirement of the constancy of character of the immortal, is defensible. We next argue against a recent attempt that accepts the dilemma, but rejects the conclusion Williams draws from it. From these we conclude that blocking the second horn of the dilemma is the best way to respond to Williams. Our objection contends that Williams overlooks a basic feature of human existence, namely curiosity, and that his negative evaluation of an eternal life is therefore unconvincing.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TANIC-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2016-02-13)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
God and Eternal Boredom.Vuko Andrić & Attila Tanyi - 2017 - Religious Studies 53 (1):51-70.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-07-16

Total views
520 ( #4,461 of 38,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
150 ( #2,286 of 38,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.