The AGM theory and inconsistent belief change

Logique Et Analyse 48 (189-192):113-150 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The problem of how to accommodate inconsistencies has attracted quite a number of researchers, in particular, in the area of database theory. The problem is also of concern in the study of belief change. For inconsistent beliefs are ubiquitous. However, comparatively little work has been devoted to discussing the problem in the literature of belief change. In this paper, I examine how adequate the AGM theory is as a logical framework for belief change involving inconsistencies. The technique is to apply to Grove’s sphere system, a semantical representation of the AGM theory, logics that do not infer everything from contradictory premises, viz., paraconsistent logics. I use three paraconsistent logics and discuss three sphere systems that are based on them. I then examine the completeness of the postulates of the AGM theory with respect to the systems. At the end, I discuss some philosophical implications of the examination.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TANTAT
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Paraconsistent Dynamics.Patrick Girard & Koji Tanaka - 2016 - Synthese 193 (1):1-14.
AGM-Like Paraconsistent Belief Change.Testa, Rafael R.; Coniglio, Marcelo E. & Ribeiro, Marcio M.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-10-31

Total views
34 ( #32,623 of 38,850 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #29,864 of 38,850 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.