How to (and how not to) think about top-down influences on visual perception

Consciousness and Cognition 47:17-25 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The question of whether cognition can influence perception has a long history in neuroscience and philosophy. Here, we outline a novel approach to this issue, arguing that it should be viewed within the framework of top-down information-processing. This approach leads to a reversal of the standard explanatory order of the cognitive penetration debate: we suggest studying top-down processing at various levels without preconceptions of perception or cognition. Once a clear picture has emerged about which processes have influences on those at lower levels, we can re-address the extent to which they should be considered perceptual or cognitive. Using top-down processing within the visual system as a model for higher-level influences, we argue that the current evidence indicates clear constraints on top-down influences at all stages of information processing; it does, however, not support the notion of a boundary between specific types of information-processing as proposed by the cognitive impenetrability hypothesis.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TEUHTA
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-01-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Pre-Cueing, Perceptual Learning and Cognitive Penetration.Gatzia, Dimitria Electra & Brogaard, Berit
Aesthetic Opacity.Arielli, Emanuele

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-05-18

Total views
233 ( #18,884 of 49,975 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
131 ( #3,510 of 49,975 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.