Cultural Relativism

Human Rights Quarterly 22 (2):501–547 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I refute the chief arguments for cultural relativism, meaning the moral (not the descriptive) theory that goes by that name. In doing this I walk some oft-trodden paths, but I also break new ones. For instance, I take unusual pains to produce an adequate formulation of cultural relativism, and I distinguish that thesis from the relativism of present-day anthropologists, with which it is often conflated. In addition, I address not one or two, but eleven arguments for cultural relativism, many of which contribute to its popularity but receive scant attention from its critics. To elicit the failings of these arguments I deploy a host of pertinent but often neglected distinctions.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TILCR
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-01-28
Latest version: 4 (2017-01-29)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-12-10

Total views
13,311 ( #48 of 39,938 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5,836 ( #24 of 39,938 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.