Not What I Agreed To: Content and Consent

Ethics 132 (1):127–154 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Deception sometimes results in nonconsensual sex. A recent body of literature diagnoses such violations as invalidating consent: the agreement is not morally transformative, which is why the sexual contact is a rights violation. We pursue a different explanation for the wrongs in question: there is valid consent, but it is not consent to the sex act that happened. Semantic conventions play a key role in distinguishing deceptions that result in nonconsensual sex (like stealth condom removal) from those that don’t (like white lies). Our framework is also applicable to more controversial cases, like those implicated in so-called “gender fraud” complaints.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-04-02
Latest version: 4 (2021-04-19)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
409 ( #18,357 of 69,010 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
137 ( #4,561 of 69,010 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.