Not What I Agreed To: Content and Consent

Ethics 132 (1):127–154 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Deception sometimes results in nonconsensual sex. A recent body of literature diagnoses such violations as invalidating consent: the agreement is not morally transformative, which is why the sexual contact is a rights violation. We pursue a different explanation for the wrongs in question: there is valid consent, but it is not consent to the sex act that happened. Semantic conventions play a key role in distinguishing deceptions that result in nonconsensual sex (like stealth condom removal) from those that don’t (like white lies). Our framework is also applicable to more controversial cases, like those implicated in so-called “gender fraud” complaints.

Author Profiles

Emily Tilton
University of British Columbia
Jonathan Ichikawa
University of British Columbia


Added to PP

825 (#12,745)

6 months
172 (#8,526)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?