Agrobiodiversity Under Different Property Regimes

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Having an adequate and extensively recognized resource governance system is essential for the conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic resources in a highly populated planet. Despite the widely accepted importance of agrobiodiversity for future plant breeding and thus food security, there is still pervasive disagreement at the individual level on who should own genetic resources. The aim of the article is to provide conceptual clarification on the following concepts and their relation to agrobiodiversity stewardship: open access, commons, private property, state property and common heritage of humankind. After presenting each property regime, we will examine whether and how these incentivize the conservation, improvement and sharing of crop genetic resources, and conclude by defending a mixed property regime
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Agroecology as a Vehicle for Contributive Justice.Timmermann, Cristian & Félix, Georges F.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Food Sovereignty and Consumer Sovereignty: Two Antagonistic Goals?Timmermann, Cristian; Félix, Georges & Tittonell, Pablo

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
49 ( #34,928 of 42,921 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #36,254 of 42,921 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.