Does religious belief infect philosophical analysis?

Religion, Brain and Behavior 6 (1):56-66 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
One popular conception of natural theology holds that certain purely rational arguments are insulated from empirical inquiry and independently establish conclusions that provide evidence, justification, or proof of God’s existence. Yet, some raise suspicions that philosophers and theologians’ personal religious beliefs inappropriately affect these kinds of arguments. I present an experimental test of whether philosophers and theologians’ argument analysis is influenced by religious commitments. The empirical findings suggest religious belief affects philosophical analysis and offer a challenge to theists and atheists, alike: reevaluate the scope of natural theology’s conclusions or acknowledge and begin to address the influence of religious belief.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TOBDRB-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-04-08
Latest version: 2 (2019-02-10)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-04-08

Total downloads
52 ( #27,779 of 37,189 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #31,554 of 37,189 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.