Does religious belief infect philosophical analysis?

Religion, Brain and Behavior 6 (1):56-66 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
One popular conception of natural theology holds that certain purely rational arguments are insulated from empirical inquiry and independently establish conclusions that provide evidence, justification, or proof of God’s existence. Yet, some raise suspicions that philosophers and theologians’ personal religious beliefs inappropriately affect these kinds of arguments. I present an experimental test of whether philosophers and theologians’ argument analysis is influenced by religious commitments. The empirical findings suggest religious belief affects philosophical analysis and offer a challenge to theists and atheists, alike: reevaluate the scope of natural theology’s conclusions or acknowledge and begin to address the influence of religious belief.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TOBDRB-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-04-08
Latest version: 2 (2019-02-10)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
Ontological Arguments.Oppy, Graham (ed.)

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-04-08

Total views
252 ( #15,982 of 46,338 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
91 ( #6,962 of 46,338 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.