Does religious belief impact philosophical analysis?

Religion, Brain and Behavior 6 (1):56-66 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
One popular conception of natural theology holds that certain purely rational arguments are insulated from empirical inquiry and independently establish conclusions that provide evidence, justification, or proof of God’s existence. Yet, some raise suspicions that philosophers and theologians’ personal religious beliefs inappropriately affect these kinds of arguments. I present an experimental test of whether philosophers and theologians’ argument analysis is influenced by religious commitments. The empirical findings suggest religious belief affects philosophical analysis and offer a challenge to theists and atheists, alike: reevaluate the scope of natural theology’s conclusions or acknowledge and begin to address the influence of religious belief.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-04-08
Latest version: 3 (2020-06-15)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
309 ( #15,439 of 52,678 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #12,493 of 52,678 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.