A Morphology of Theories of Emergence

In Acta Morphologica Generalis. Stockholm: Acta Morphologica Generalis (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
“Emergence” – the notion of novel, unpredictable and irreducible properties developing out of complex organisational entities – is itself a complex, multi-dimensional concept. To date there is no single, generally agreed upon “theory of emergence”, but instead a number of different approaches and perspectives. Neither is there a common conceptual or meta-theoretical framework by which to systematically identify, exemplify and compare different “theories”. Building upon earlier work done by sociologist Kenneth Bailey, this article presents a method for creating such a framework, and outlines the conditions for a collaborative effort in order to carry out such a task. A brief historical and theoretical background is given both to the concept of “emergence” and to the non-quantified modelling method General Morphological Analysis (GMA).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TOMAMO-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Strong and Weak Emergence.Chalmers, David J.
Weak Emergence.Bedau, Mark A.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-01-11

Total views
138 ( #25,545 of 46,448 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #27,028 of 46,448 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.