Friends at last? Distributed cognition and the cognitive/social divide

Philosophical Psychology 27 (1):1-14 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Distributed cognition (d-cog) claims that many cognitive processes are distributed across groups and the surrounding material and cultural environment. Recently, Nancy Nersessian, Ronald Giere, and others have suggested that a d-cog approach might allow us to bring together cognitive and social theories of science. I explore this idea by focusing on the specific interpretation of d-cog found in Edwin Hutchins' canonical text Cognition in the wild. First, I examine the scope of a d-cog approach to science, showing that there are important disputes between cognitive and social theorists on which d-cog remains silent. Second, I suggest that, where social explanations can be recast in d-cog terms, this reformulation will not be acceptable to all social theorists. Finally, I ask how we should make sense of the claim that, on a d-cog analysis, social factors are cognitive factors
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Cognition in the Wild.Hutchins, Edwin
The Extended Mind.Clark, Andy & Chalmers, David J.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
120 ( #30,384 of 50,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #15,090 of 50,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.