Are visuomotor representations cognitively penetrable? Biasing action-guiding vision

Synthese:1-19 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Is action-guiding vision cognitively penetrable? More specifically, is the visual processing that guides our goal-directed actions sensitive to semantic information from cognitive states? This paper critically examines a recent family of arguments whose aim is to challenge a widespread and influential view in philosophy and cognitive science: the view that action-guiding vision is cognitively impenetrable. I argue, in response, that while there may very well be top–down causal influences on action-guiding vision, they should not be taken to be an instance of cognitive penetration. Assuming otherwise is to assign a computational role to the influencing states that they cannot perform. Although questions about cognitive penetrability are ultimately empirical, the issues addressed in this paper are largely philosophical. The discussion here highlights an important set of considerations that help better understand the relations between cognition, vision, and action.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TORAVR-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Visual Brain in Action.Milner, A. David & Goodale, Melvyn A.
The Modularity of Mind.Cummins, Robert & Fodor, Jerry

View all 58 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-06-20

Total views
48 ( #35,226 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #26,403 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.