Ostrich presentism

Philosophical Studies 170 (2):255-276 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ostrich presentists maintain that we can use all the expressive resources of the tensed language to provide an explanation of why true claims about the past are true, without thereby paying any price in terms of ontology or basic ideology. I clarify the position by making a distinction between three kinds of explanation, which has general interest and applicability. I then criticize the ostrich position because it requires an unconstrained version of the third form of explanation, which is out of place in metaphysics
Categories
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TOROP
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-09-29

Total views
145 ( #38,111 of 64,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #42,096 of 64,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.