Anachronism, Antiquarianism, and Konstellationsforschung: A Critique of Beiser

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In his Introduction to The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy (2008), entitled ‘The Puzzling Hegel Renaissance’, Frederick Beiser, the editor of the volume, claims that Anglophone Hegel research has been in the main deeply problematic and proceeds to offer a program of research for its rejuvenation. The paper argues that the reasons based on which he exercises his critique (antiquarianism and anachronism) fail on internal grounds and that, therefore, Hegelforschung should not be reduced to his proposed research program (Konstellationsforschung). The argument is built around four Hegelian themes: (a) the nature of the Hegelian categories, (b) Hegel’s philosophy of nature, (c) the relation between antiquarianism and our culture, and (d) Hegel’s methodology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TRIAAA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Logic of the Border.Trisokkas, Ioannis

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-07-15

Total views
146 ( #26,897 of 50,109 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #40,952 of 50,109 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.