Abstract
Recent research has defended the surprising thesis that in many cases the search
for truth is better off if the information exchanged between the members of an
epistemic community is limited. This is what one may call the limited information
thesis. There is, however, the possibility of an even more radical position
than this: the thesis that any communication between peers has zero epistemic
value and that the search for truth is better off if the truth-inquirer does not take
into consideration the truth-claims of her peers. This can be called the solitude
thesis. The paper defends the claim that Descartes is a supporter of the solitude
thesis with respect to metaphysical inquiry. The defense is facilitated by means of
interpreting textual evidence found in Descartes’ essays Discourse on the Method,
The Search for Truth and the Meditations on First Philosophy.