The Paradox of Humbleness, Arrogance and the Concept of Fluid Individuality

Mental Health and Human Resilience International Journal 8 (2):3 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The subject of analysis for this essay is the leanness of the concept of pride and humility and the argument that each of these extremes create imbalance and stifle identity. Humility involves a feeling of low self-worth in order to seek the approval of others and leads to blurring of personal identity, whereas arrogance, results in paranoia, which denies the individual contact and flexibility. Based on the flow and change (Pallas), on the one hand, and the Taoist concept of Laozi on the other hand, the essay developed the notion of fluidity for being an individual. A fluid individual is neither rigidly defined by humbleness, nor is having to deal with arrogance, but rather can balance between the two in certain context and/or role and at the same time be genuine. This framework can provide a fair approach regarding the issue of autonomy and richness of the individual’s self-fulfilment

Author's Profile

Rajeev Lochan Tripathi
Banaras Hindu university

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-06

Downloads
37 (#101,513)

6 months
37 (#98,334)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?