On Trusting Wikipedia

Episteme 6 (1):74-90 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Given the fact that many people use Wikipedia, we should ask: Can we trust it? The empirical evidence suggests that Wikipedia articles are sometimes quite good but that they vary a great deal. As such, it is wrong to ask for a monolithic verdict on Wikipedia. Interacting with Wikipedia involves assessing where it is likely to be reliable and where not. I identify five strategies that we use to assess claims from other sources and argue that, to a greater of lesser degree, Wikipedia frustrates all of them. Interacting responsibly with something like Wikipedia requires new epistemic methods and strategies.
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-06-06
Latest version: 2 (2018-06-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
617 ( #9,749 of 64,256 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #7,979 of 64,256 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.