On Trusting Wikipedia

Episteme 6 (1):74-90 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Given the fact that many people use Wikipedia, we should ask: Can we trust it? The empirical evidence suggests that Wikipedia articles are sometimes quite good but that they vary a great deal. As such, it is wrong to ask for a monolithic verdict on Wikipedia. Interacting with Wikipedia involves assessing where it is likely to be reliable and where not. I identify five strategies that we use to assess claims from other sources and argue that, to a greater of lesser degree, Wikipedia frustrates all of them. Interacting responsibly with something like Wikipedia requires new epistemic methods and strategies.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2009
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TRUPM
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-06-06
Latest version: 2 (2018-06-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-07-11

Total views
617 ( #9,749 of 64,256 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #7,979 of 64,256 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.