A conspicuous art: putting Gettier to the test

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Professional philosophers say it’s obvious that a Gettier subject does not know. But experimental philosophers and psychologists have argued that laypeople and non-Westerners view Gettier subjects very differently, based on experiments where laypeople tend to ascribe knowledge to Gettier subjects. I argue that when effectively probed, laypeople and non-Westerners unambiguously agree that Gettier subjects do not know
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TURACA
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-06-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Gettier Across Cultures.Machery, Edouard; Stich, Stephen; Rose, David; Chatterjee, Amita; Karasawa, Kaori; Struchiner, Noel; Sirker, Smita; Usui, Naoki & Hashimoto, Takaaki
Belief Through Thick and Thin.Buckwalter, Wesley; Rose, David & Turri, John
Knowledge and Luck.Turri, John; Buckwalter, Wesley & Blouw, Peter

View all 45 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-02-05

Total views
186 ( #22,881 of 50,248 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #35,078 of 50,248 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.