A Puzzle about withholding

Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):355-364 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper presents a puzzle about justification and withholding. The puzzle arises in a special case where experts advise us to not withhold judgment. My main thesis is simply that the puzzle is genuinely a puzzle, and so leads us to rethink some common assumptions in epistemology, specifically assumptions about the nature of justification and doxastic attitudes. Section 1 introduces the common assumptions. Section 2 presents the puzzle case. Section 3 assesses the puzzle case. Section 4 explains the choice we're faced with. Sections 5 and 6 consider and reject some proposed solutions, and in the process refine and clarify the choice we're faced with. Section 7 considers and rejects a miscellany of different proposed solutions
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-07-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
129 ( #39,483 of 2,448,680 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #51,314 of 2,448,680 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.