Literature Review: What Artificial General Intelligence Safety Researchers Have Written About the Nature of Human Values

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Abstract: The field of artificial general intelligence (AGI) safety is quickly growing. However, the nature of human values, with which future AGI should be aligned, is underdefined. Different AGI safety researchers have suggested different theories about the nature of human values, but there are contradictions. This article presents an overview of what AGI safety researchers have written about the nature of human values, up to the beginning of 2019. 21 authors were overviewed, and some of them have several theories. A theory classification method is suggested, where the theories are judged according to the level of their complexity and behaviorists-internalists scale, as well as the level of their generality-humanity. We suggest that a multiplicity of well-supported theories means that the nature of human values is difficult to define, and some meta-level theory is needed.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TURLRW
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-04-25
Latest version: 2 (2019-04-26)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-04-25

Total views
84 ( #36,305 of 51,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #25,738 of 51,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.