Public sociology and democratic theory

In Jeroen Van Bouwel (ed.), The Social Sciences and Democracy. Palgrave-Macmillan (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Sociology, as conceived by Comte, was to put an end to the anarchy of opinions characteristic of liberal democracy by replacing opinion with the truths of sociology, imposed through indoctrination. Later sociologists backed away from this, making sociology acceptable to liberal democracy by being politically neutral. The critics of this solution asked 'whose side are we on?' Burawoy provides a novel justification for advocacy scholarship in sociology. Public sociology is intended to have political effects, but also to be funded by the politically neutral state. He argues that public sociology is institutionally neutral, but that committing to an organic relation with a social movement is legitimate as a matter of the sociologist's personal value choice. Although this produces side-taking sociology, by improving the case for particular standpoints it serves to improve democratic discussion generally, which is an appropriately neutral public aim.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2009
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TURPSA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-07-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-05-19

Total views
95 ( #35,839 of 52,748 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #34,475 of 52,748 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.