The distinctive “should” of assertability

Philosophical Psychology 30 (4):481-489 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recent work has assumed that the normativity associated with assertion differs from the normativity of morality, practical rationality, etiquette, and legality. That is, whether an assertion “should” be made is not merely a function of these other familiar sorts of normativity and is especially connected to truth. Some researchers have challenged this assumption of distinctive normativity. In this paper I report two experiments that test the assumption. Participants read a brief story, judged whether an assertion should be made, and rated several other qualities of the assertion, including its truth value, morality, rationality, etiquette, legality, and folly. Of these qualities, truth value most strongly predicted assertability. The findings support the assumption of distinctive normativity and provide further evidence that the norm of our social practice of assertion is factive.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TURTDS
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-06-30
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-03-30

Total views
48 ( #55,587 of 2,448,649 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #63,628 of 2,448,649 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.