Racial Transitions and Controversial Positions

Philosophy Today 62 (1):73-88 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this essay, I reply to critiques of my article “In Defense of Transracialism.” Echoing Chloë Taylor and Lewis Gordon’s remarks on the controversy over my article, I first reflect on the lack of intellectual generosity displayed in response to my paper. In reply to Kris Sealey, I next argue that it is dangerous to hinge the moral acceptability of a particular identity or practice on what she calls a collective co-signing. In reply to Sabrina Hom, I suggest that relying on the language of passing to describe transracialism is potentially misleading. In reply to Tina Botts, I both defend analytic philosophy of race against her multiple criticisms and suggest that Botts’s remarks risk complicity with a form of transphobia that Talia Mae Bettcher calls the Basic Denial of Authenticity. I end by gesturing toward a more inclusive understanding of racial identity.
Keywords
ISBN(s)
0031-8256
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TUVRTA
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-12-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-04-13

Total views
440 ( #16,911 of 69,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
160 ( #3,653 of 69,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.