Argument maps improve critical thinking

Teaching Philosophy 27 (2):95--116 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Computer-based argument mapping greatly enhances student critical thinking, more than tripling absolute gains made by other methods. I describe the method and my experience as an outsider. Argument mapping often showed precisely how students were erring (for example: confusing helping premises for separate reasons), making it much easier for them to fix their errors.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-03-07
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
1,116 ( #4,014 of 2,448,636 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
75 ( #7,884 of 2,448,636 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.