Normatywne implikacje preferencji wobec osób zidentyfikowanych

Diametros 51:113-136 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The results of empirical research show that people prefer to help identified individuals rather than unidentified ones. This preference has an important influence on many private and public decisions, for example concerning vaccination or the distribution of healthcare resources. The aim of this article is to define the terms: “identified”, “unidentified”, “statistical”, and then to analyze three philosophical arguments concerning the normative implications of this preference: 1) contractualism ex ante ; 2) fair distribution of chances and risks; 3) principles regarding the concentration of good effects and the distribution of bad effects. I will demonstrate that these arguments, which are related to interesting philosophical problems, such as counterfactuals, are not convincing.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
URATNI
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-08-08
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-03-27

Total views
80 ( #47,572 of 2,445,937 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #56,515 of 2,445,937 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.