A Secondary Tool for Demarcation Problem: Logical Fallacies

Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):85-104 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Thagard, the behavior of practitioners of a field may also be used for demarcation between science and pseudoscience due to its social dimension in addition to the epistemic one. I defended the tendency of pseudoscientists to commit fallacies, and the number of fallacies they commit can be a secondary tool for demarcation problem and this tool is consistent with Thagardian approach. In this paper, I selected the astrology as the case and I revealed nine types of logical fallacies frequently committed by astrologers while introducing their field and/or defending their claims against the scientific inquiries and refutation efforts. I also argued that recognizing these fallacies may help the audience to demarcate between the scientific and the pseudoscientific arguments.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-15

Downloads
592 (#30,257)

6 months
112 (#43,302)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?