Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map

Philosophy Compass 7 (9):654-664 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article provides a conceptual map of the debate on ideal and non‐ideal theory. It argues that this debate encompasses a number of different questions, which have not been kept sufficiently separate in the literature. In particular, the article distinguishes between the following three interpretations of the ‘ideal vs. non‐ideal theory’ contrast: full compliance vs. partial compliance theory; utopian vs. realistic theory; end‐state vs. transitional theory. The article advances critical reflections on each of these sub‐debates, and highlights areas for future research in the field.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VALIVN-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-05-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 62 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Political Realism as Ideology Critique.Prinz, Janosch & Rossi, Enzo

View all 137 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-08-23

Total views
532 ( #7,327 of 49,032 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #20,622 of 49,032 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.