Most Peers Don’t Believe It, Hence It Is Probably False

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (4):87-112 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rob Lovering has recently argued that since theists have been unable, by means of philosophical arguments, to convince 85 percent of professional philosophers that God exists, at least one of their defining beliefs must be either false or meaningless. This paper is a critical examination of his argument. First we present Lovering’s argument and point out its salient features. Next we explain why the argument’s conclusion is entirely acceptable for theists, even if, as we show, there are multiple problems with the premises.

Author Profiles

René Van Woudenberg
VU University Amsterdam
Hans Van Eyghen
VU University Amsterdam

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-25

Downloads
670 (#11,986)

6 months
77 (#13,284)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?