Most Peers Don’t Believe It, Hence It Is Probably False

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Rob Lovering has recently argued that since theists have been unable, by means of philosophical arguments, to convince 85 percent of professional philosophers that God exists, at least one of their defining beliefs must be either false or meaningless. This paper is a critical examination of his argument. First we present Lovering’s argument and point out its salient features. Next we explain why the argument’s conclusion is entirely acceptable for theists, even if, as we show, there are multiple problems with the premises.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANMPD
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-10-25
Latest version: 2 (2017-12-20)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-10-25

Total views
520 ( #12,242 of 64,256 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #7,331 of 64,256 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.