Most Peers Don’t Believe It, Hence It Is Probably False

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Rob Lovering has recently argued that since theists have been unable, by means of philosophical arguments, to convince 85 percent of professional philosophers that God exists, at least one of their defining beliefs must be either false or meaningless. This paper is a critical examination of his argument. First we present Lovering’s argument and point out its salient features. Next we explain why the argument’s conclusion is entirely acceptable for theists, even if, as we show, there are multiple problems with the premises.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANMPD
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-10-25
Latest version: 2 (2017-12-20)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
Laws and Symmetry.van Fraassen, Bas C.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-10-25

Total views
136 ( #22,447 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #20,958 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.