Unsharpenable Vagueness

Philosophical Topics 28 (1):1-10 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A plausible thought about vagueness is that it involves semantic incompleteness. To say that a predicate is vague is to say (at the very least) that its extension is incompletely specified. Where there is incomplete specification of extension there is indeterminacy, an indeterminacy between various ways in which the specification of the predicate might be completed or sharpened. In this paper we show that this idea is bound to founder by presenting an argument to the effect that there are vague predicates which cannot be sharpened in such a way as to meet certain basic constraints (of penumbral connection and public accessibility) that must be imposed on the very notion of a sharpening.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Supervaluationism and Its Logics.Achille C. Varzi - 2007 - Mind 116 (463):633-676.
Vagueness in Geography.Achille C. Varzi - 2001 - Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):49–65.
The Soritical Centipede.Horgan, Terry; Ballantyne, Nathan & Fiala, Brian

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
260 ( #13,770 of 43,733 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #34,954 of 43,733 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.