Le devoir m'appelle? Reinach et Williams sur les limites de l'obligation

Philosophie 128 (1):50 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I show where Adolf Reinach comes down on the question of conflicts of obligation. The aim is to look at whether Reinach’s phenomenological realism of obligation holds its own against positions developed by Bernard Williams concerning the nature and import of obligations, and their capacity or incapacity to impinge upon each other and other moral and non-moral concerns. It is shown that even if Reinach turns out to succumb to pitfalls Williams identifies, he nonetheless verges upon agreement with Williams in more ways than one might expect. This result is significant because it shows that Reinach’s phenomenological realism, in contrast to certain forms of moral realism, lays the foundations for what can be considered a heterontology of obligation and ethical concerns, which is presupposed by the experience of (moral) conflict in the first place.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-08-29
Latest version: 2 (2016-08-29)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Deontology.McNaughton, David; University, Florida State & Rawling, Piers
Prima Facie Obligation.Asher, Nicholas & Bonevac, Daniel

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
142 ( #27,457 of 50,257 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #30,565 of 50,257 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.