Thick Concepts and Underdetermination

In Simon Kirchin (ed.), Thick Concepts. Oxford University Press. pp. 136-160 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Thick terms and concepts in ethics somehow combine evaluation and non-evaluative description. The non-evaluative aspects of thick terms and concepts underdetermine their extensions. Many writers argue that this underdetermination point is best explained by supposing that thick terms and concepts are semantically evaluative in some way such that evaluation plays a role in determining their extensions. This paper argues that the extensions of thick terms and concepts are underdetermined by their meanings in toto, irrespective of whether their extensions are partly determined by evaluation; the underdetermination point can therefore be explained without supposing that thick terms and concepts are semantically evaluative. My argument applies general points about semantic gradability and context-sensitivity to the semantics of thick terms and concepts
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-05-12
Latest version: 2 (2017-05-19)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
361 ( #20,962 of 69,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #50,415 of 69,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.