What good is a will?

In Anton Leist & Holger Baumann (eds.), Action in Context. de Gruyter/Mouton (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
As a philosopher of action, I might be expected to believe that the will is a good thing. Actually, I believe that the will is a great thing - awesome, in fact. But I'm not thereby committed to its being something good. When I say that the will is awesome, I mean literally that it is a proper object of awe, a response that restrains us from abusing the will and moves us rather to use it respectfully, in a way that does it justice. To say that the will is a good thing, however, would imply that having a will is better than not having one, or that using it is better than not using it - neither of which I am prepared to assert as a general rule. Speaking metaphorically, I would say that the will is like a magic wand. In fairy tales, the character who looks upon a magic wand as an unalloyed good is destined to be sadder but wiser in the end. Being a magician isn't better than being an ordinary human, just different; and a magician must value his powers by respecting them and therefore using them appropriately, even sparingly, not by using them as much as possible.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VELWGI
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Shmagency Question.Silverstein, Matthew

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
1,280 ( #1,660 of 45,271 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
124 ( #4,126 of 45,271 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.