What words mean and express: semantics and pragmatics of kind terms and verbs

Journal of Pragmatics 117:231-244 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
For many years, it has been common-ground in semantics and in philosophy of language that semantics is in the business of providing a full explanation about how propositional meanings are obtained. This orthodox picture seems to be in trouble these days, as an increasing number of authors now hold that semantics does not deal with thought-contents. Some of these authors have embraced a “thin meanings” view, according to which lexical meanings are too schematic to enter propositional contents. I will suggest that it is plausible to adopt thin semantics for a class of words. However, I’ll also hold that some classes of words, like kind terms, plausibly have richer lexical meanings, and so that an adequate theory of word meaning may have to combine thin and rich semantics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-08-04
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
1,470 ( #2,823 of 64,254 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
167 ( #3,141 of 64,254 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.