What words mean and express: semantics and pragmatics of kind terms and verbs

Journal of Pragmatics 117:231-244 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
For many years, it has been common-ground in semantics and in philosophy of language that semantics is in the business of providing a full explanation about how propositional meanings are obtained. This orthodox picture seems to be in trouble these days, as an increasing number of authors now hold that semantics does not deal with thought-contents. Some of these authors have embraced a “thin meanings” view, according to which lexical meanings are too schematic to enter propositional contents. I will suggest that it is plausible to adopt thin semantics for a class of words. However, I’ll also hold that some classes of words, like kind terms, plausibly have richer lexical meanings, and so that an adequate theory of word meaning may have to combine thin and rich semantics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-08-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Doing Without Concepts.Machery, Edouard
Literal Meaning.Recanati, François

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
436 ( #7,237 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
161 ( #2,489 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.