Massive Modularity: An Ontological Hypothesis or an Adaptationist Discovery Heuristic?

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 36 (4):317-334 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cognitive modules are internal mental structures. Some theorists and empirical researchers hypothesise that the human mind is either partially or massively comprised of structures that are modular in nature. Is the massive modularity of mind hypothesis a cogent view about the ontological nature of human mind or is it, rather, an effective/ineffective adaptationist discovery heuristic for generating predictively successful hypotheses about both heretofore unknown psychological traits and unknown properties of already identified psychological traits? Considering the inadequacies of the case in favour of massive modularity as an ontological hypothesis, I suggest approaching and valuing massive modularity as an adaptationist discovery heuristic.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-09

Downloads
294 (#73,394)

6 months
163 (#20,369)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?