Heidegger's Logico-Semantic Strikeback

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In (1959), Carnap famously attacked Heidegger for having constructed an insane metaphysics based on a misconception of both the logical form and the semantics of ordinary language. In what follows, it will be argued that, once one appropriately (i.e., in a Russellian fashion) reads Heidegger’s famous sentence that should paradigmatically exemplify such a misconception, i.e., “the nothing nothings”, there is nothing either logically or semantically wrong with it. The real controversy as to how that sentence has to be evaluated—not as to its meaning but as to its truth—lies at the metaphysico- ontological level. For in order for the sentence to be true one has to endorse an ontology of impossibilia and Leibniz’s principle of the identity of indiscernibles.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VOLHLS
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-03-23

Total views
167 ( #25,181 of 51,699 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #32,027 of 51,699 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.