How Should We Aggregate Competing Claims?

Ethics 125 (1):64-87 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Many believe that we ought to save a large number from being permanently bedridden rather than save one from death. Many also believe that we ought to save one from death rather than a multitude from a very minor harm, no matter how large this multitude. I argue that a principle I call “Aggregate Relevant Claims” satisfactorily explains these judgments. I offer a rationale for this principle and defend it against objections.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Tolerance and the Distributed Sorites.Zach Barnett - 2019 - Synthese 196 (3):1071-1077.
Axiological Absolutism and Risk1.Lazar, Seth & Lee‐Stronach, Chad

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
363 ( #6,974 of 38,069 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #7,092 of 38,069 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.