Orthogonality of Phenomenality and Content

American Philosophical Quarterly 45 (4):309 - 328 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper presents arguments from empirical research and from philosophical considerations to the effect that phenomenality and content are two distinct and independent features of mental representations, which are both relational. Thus, it is argued, classical arguments that infer phenomenality from content have to be rejected. Likewise, theories that try to explain the phenomenal character of experiences by appeal to specific types of content cannot succeed. Instead, a dynamic view of consciousness has to be adopted that seeks to explain consciousness by certain ways of processing representations. Therefore, only empirical methods that are able to investigate the dynamics of the mind can be used for the “quest for consciousness” proper. Moreover, the central intuitions about consciousness are best explained when phenomenality and content are clearly distinguished.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Memory and Content.Vosgerau, Gottfried
Authorship and Control Over Thoughts.Vosgerau, Gottfried & Voss, Martin

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
131 ( #27,104 of 47,316 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #37,607 of 47,316 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.