The History of Philosophy Conceived as a Struggle Between Nominalism and Realism

Semiotica 2010 (179):295-313 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this article I trace some of the main tenets of the struggle between nominalism and realism as identified by John Deely in his Four ages of understanding. The aim is to assess Deely’s claim that the Age of Modernity was nominalist and that the coming age, the Age of Postmodernism — which he portrays as a renaissance of the late middle ages and as starting with Peirce — is realist. After a general overview of how Peirce interpreted the nominalist-realist controversy, Deely gives special attention to Thomas Aquinas’s On being and essence and the realism it entails. A subsequent discussion of the Modern Period shows that the issue of nominalism and realism is very much tied up with di¤erent conceptions of the intellect. Deely credits the theory of evolution with bringing us a conception of the intellect that is closer to that of the Middle Ages and that opens the way for a truly realistic ‘‘fourth age’’ of the understanding
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-08-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On What There Is.Quine, W. V. O.
On What There Is.Baylis, Charles A.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
213 ( #20,591 of 50,425 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #19,883 of 50,425 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.