The peculiar case of Lehrer’s lawyer

Synthese 195 (4):1615-1630 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The peculiar case of Lehrer’s lawyer purports to describe a scenario in which a subject has a justified belief, indeed knowledge, despite the fact that their belief is not causally or counterfactually sustained by any good reasons for it. The case has proven controversial. While some agree with Lehrer’s assessment of the case, others disagree, leading to a schism among accounts of the basing relation. In this paper I aim to reconcile these camps and put simple causal and counterfactual accounts of the basing relation back on the table, by arguing that Lehrer’s case is probably metaphysically impossible, but even if it isn’t, it is ambiguous between a psychologically implausible and a psychologically plausible reading, and this can account for the diverging intuitions that it generates.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WALTPC-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-02-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-12-20

Total views
134 ( #39,722 of 64,120 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #54,283 of 64,120 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.