From Ideal Worlds to Ideality

Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9 (1):114-134 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In common treatments of deontic logic, the obligatory is what is true in all deontically ideal possible worlds. In this article, I offer a new semantics for Standard Deontic Logic with Leibnizian intensions rather than possible worlds. Even though the new semantics furnishes models that resemble Venn diagrams, the semantics captures the strong soundness and completeness of Standard Deontic Logic. Since, unlike possible worlds, many Leibnizian intensions are not maximally consistent entities, we can amend the semantics to invalidate the inference rule which ensures that all tautologies are obligatory. I sketch this amended semantics to show how it invalidates the rule in a new way.

Author's Profile

Craig Warmke
Northern Illinois University

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-12

Downloads
587 (#37,151)

6 months
149 (#26,629)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?