Methuselah’s Diary and the Finitude of the Past

Philosophia Christi 15 (2):463-69 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
William Lane Craig modified Bertrand Russell’s Tristram Shandy example in order to derive an absurdity that would demonstrate the finitude of the past. Although his initial attempt at such an argument faltered, further developments in the literature suggested that such an absurdity was indeed in the offing provided that a couple extra statements were also shown to be true. This article traces the development of a particular line of argument that arose from Craig’s Tristram Shandy example before advancing an argument of its own that attempts to fill in the relevant gaps so as to yield a new argument for the finitude of the past.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WATMDA-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 6 (2019-03-25)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-03-08

Total views
4,189 ( #414 of 55,966 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
420 ( #789 of 55,966 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.