Creditworthiness and Matching Principles

In Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Vol 7. Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
You are creditworthy for φ-ing only if φ-ing is the right thing to do. Famously though, further conditions are needed too – Kant’s shopkeeper did the right thing, but is not creditworthy for doing so. This case shows that creditworthiness requires that there be a certain kind of explanation of why you did the right thing. The reasons for which you act – your motivating reasons – must meet some further conditions. In this paper, I defend a new account of these conditions. On this account, creditworthiness requires that your motivating reasons be normative reasons, and that the principles from which you act match normative principles.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WAYCAM
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-12-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael
In Praise of Desire.Arpaly, Nomy & Schroeder, Timothy

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Testimonial Worth.Peet, Andrew

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-12-01

Total views
183 ( #18,142 of 42,974 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #9,503 of 42,974 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.