Perspectivism and the Argument from Guidance

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (2):361-374 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Perspectivists hold that what you ought to do is determined by your perspective, that is, your epistemic position. Objectivists hold that what you ought to do is determined by the facts irrespective of your perspective. This paper explores an influential argument for perspectivism which appeals to the thought that the normative is action guiding. The crucial premise of the argument is that you ought to φ only if you are able to φ for the reasons which determine that you ought to φ. We show that this premise can be understood in different ways. On one reading, it provides no support for perspectivism. On another reading, the premise lacks support. So, the argument fails. An important upshot of the paper is that the objectivist can embrace the thought about guidance.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WAYPAT
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-12-08
Latest version: 2 (2017-01-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
One Desire Too Many.Howard, Nathan Robert
Dispossessing Defeat.González de Prado, Javier

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-12-08

Total views
233 ( #15,404 of 43,789 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #9,676 of 43,789 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.