Rethinking boltzmannian equilibrium

Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1224-1235 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Boltzmannian statistical mechanics partitions the phase space of a sys- tem into macro-regions, and the largest of these is identified with equilibrium. What justifies this identification? Common answers focus on Boltzmann’s combinatorial argument, the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, and maxi- mum entropy considerations. We argue that they fail and present a new answer. We characterise equilibrium as the macrostate in which a system spends most of its time and prove a new theorem establishing that equilib- rium thus defined corresponds to the largest macro-region. Our derivation is completely general in that it does not rely on assumptions about a system’s dynamics or internal interactions.
Reprint years
2015
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WERRBE
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-12-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Who’s Afraid of Nagelian Reduction?Dizadji-Bahmani, Foad; Frigg, Roman & Hartmann, Stephan

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
When Does a Boltzmannian Equilibrium Exist?Werndl, Charlotte & Frigg, Roman

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-11-27

Total views
168 ( #23,039 of 47,294 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #35,243 of 47,294 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.