Felon Disenfranchisement and Democratic Legitimacy

Social Theory and Practice 43 (2):283-311 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Political theorists have long criticized policies that deny voting rights to convicted felons. However, some have recently turned to democratic theory to defend this practice, arguing that democratic self-determination justifies, or even requires, disenfranchising felons. I review these new arguments, acknowledge their force against existing criticism, and then offer a new critique of disenfranchisement that engages them on their own terms. Using democratic theory’s “all-subjected principle,” I argue that liberal democracies undermine their own legitimacy when they deny the vote to felons and prisoners. I then show how this argument overcomes obstacles that cause problems for other critiques of disenfranchisement.
Reprint years
2017
ISBN(s)
0037-802X  
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WHIFDA
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-14

Total views
946 ( #2,554 of 44,410 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
256 ( #1,534 of 44,410 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.