Felon Disenfranchisement and Democratic Legitimacy

Social Theory and Practice 43 (2):283-311 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Political theorists have long criticized policies that deny voting rights to convicted felons. However, some have recently turned to democratic theory to defend this practice, arguing that democratic self-determination justifies, or even requires, disenfranchising felons. I review these new arguments, acknowledge their force against existing criticism, and then offer a new critique of disenfranchisement that engages them on their own terms. Using democratic theory’s “all-subjected principle,” I argue that liberal democracies undermine their own legitimacy when they deny the vote to felons and prisoners. I then show how this argument overcomes obstacles that cause problems for other critiques of disenfranchisement.
Reprint years
2017
ISBN(s)
0037-802X
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WHIFDA
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-10-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-10-14

Total views
1,284 ( #2,332 of 53,584 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
157 ( #2,817 of 53,584 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.